Legislature(2013 - 2014)CAPITOL 120
03/12/2013 10:00 AM House FISHERIES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB110 | |
| HB143 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 110 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 143 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES
March 12, 2013
10:04 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Paul Seaton, Chair
Representative Eric Feige
Representative Lynn Gattis
Representative Bob Herron
Representative Craig Johnson
Representative Kurt Olson
Representative Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 110
"An Act prohibiting the use of barbed hooks in certain
freshwater areas."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 143
"An Act relating to crewmember fishing licenses."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 110
SHORT TITLE: BARBED HOOKS
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) SEATON
02/11/13 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/11/13 (H) FSH, RES
02/21/13 (H) FSH AT 10:00 AM CAPITOL 120
02/21/13 (H) Heard & Held
02/21/13 (H) MINUTE(FSH)
02/26/13 (H) FSH AT 10:00 AM CAPITOL 120
02/26/13 (H) Heard & Held
02/26/13 (H) MINUTE(FSH)
03/12/13 (H) FSH AT 10:00 AM CAPITOL 120
BILL: HB 143
SHORT TITLE: COMMERCIAL FISHING CREWMEMBER LICENSES
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) SEATON
02/27/13 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/27/13 (H) FSH, FIN
03/12/13 (H) FSH AT 10:00 AM CAPITOL 120
WITNESS REGISTER
BURKE WALDRON, Captain; Operations Commander
Division of Alaska Wildlife Troopers
Department of Public Safety
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during discussion about HB 110.
ERIC JORDAN
Commercial Fisherman
Sitka, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 110 and HB 143.
DAN DUNAWAY
Dillingham, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during discussion of HB 110.
CHARLES SWANTON, Director
Division of Sport Fish
Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G)
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during discussion of HB 110.
DOUGLAS DUNCAN, Staff
Representative Paul Seaton
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Introduced HB 143 on behalf of the sponsor,
Representative Seaton.
JAMES HERBERT
Commercial Fisherman
Seward, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 143.
KEVIN BROOKS, Deputy Commissioner
Office of the Commissioner
Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G)
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified during discussion of HB 143.
ACTION NARRATIVE
10:04:44 AM
CHAIR PAUL SEATON called the House Special Committee on
Fisheries meeting to order at 10:04 a.m. Representatives
Seaton, Kreiss-Tomkins, Feige, Olson, Johnson, and Herron were
present at the call to order. Representative Gattis arrived as
the meeting was in progress.
HB 110-BARBED HOOKS
10:05:06 AM
CHAIR SEATON announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 110, "An Act prohibiting the use of barbed hooks
in certain freshwater areas." [Before the committee was Version
28-LS0360\U.]
CHAIR SEATON noted that the committee was also considering a
resolution for the lowering of Chinook salmon by-catch in the
Gulf and Bering Sea troll fisheries.
10:06:34 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON moved to adopt the proposed committee
substitute (CS) for HB 110, labeled 28-LS0360\N, Bullard,
3/11/13, as the working draft.
10:06:52 AM
CHAIR SEATON objected for discussion.
CHAIR SEATON explained that the proposed committee substitute
would move this statutory prohibition on the use of barbed hooks
from AS 16.10 to AS 16.05, which would now include this
restriction with other similar violations.
10:08:09 AM
CHAIR SEATON removed his objection, and there being no further
objection, Version N was adopted as the working draft.
10:08:47 AM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
10:09:22 AM
CHAIR SEATON moved to adopt Amendment 1, labeled 28-LS0360\N.1,
Bullard, 3/11/13, which read:
Page 1, following line 13:
Insert a new subsection to read:
"(d) In this section, "barbed hook" means a hook with
at least one subsidiary point facing in the opposite
direction of the main point of the hook; "barbed hook"
does not include a hook from which all barbs have been
pinched down, filed off, or otherwise removed."
CHAIR SEATON explained that the purpose of the proposed
amendment was to add a definition for barbed hook into the
regulation.
10:10:44 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON objected.
10:11:05 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON removed his objection. There being no
further objection, Amendment 1 was adopted.
10:11:23 AM
CHAIR SEATON moved to adopt Amendment 2, labeled 28-LS0360\N.2,
Bullard, 3/11/13, which read:
Page 1, following line 13:
Insert a new subsection to read:
"(d) In this section,
(1) "freshwater" means all inland water;
(2) "inland water" means water separated from salt
water at the mouths of creeks and streams and rivers
at a line between the extremities of a river's banks
at a mean low tide or at a point to be determined and
adequately marked by the department."
10:12:06 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON objected for discussion.
CHAIR SEATON explained that, as it was necessary to define the
fresh waters affected by the proposed bill, proposed Amendment 2
offered that definition.
10:12:41 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON removed his objection. There being no
further objection, Amendment 2 was adopted.
10:13:21 AM
CHAIR SEATON opened public testimony.
10:14:23 AM
BURKE WALDRON, Captain; Operations Commander, Division of Alaska
Wildlife Troopers, Department of Public Safety, suggested that a
re-wording of the description for barbed hooks in Amendment 1 to
read "a separate or different direction," instead of "the
opposite direction" for the point of the primary hook would lend
greater clarity. He announced that he was still evaluating the
definitions for "fresh water" and "inland water" in Amendment 2,
and that he would comment on this at a later time.
10:15:57 AM
ERIC JORDAN, Commercial Fisherman, stated his support for HB 110
and his support for conservation. He questioned why the House
Special Committee on Fisheries was involved with this, as, he
opined, it was an Alaska Board of Fisheries issue.
CHAIR SEATON explained that both the Alaska Board of Fisheries
and the legislature addressed issues, and that the legislature
had the responsibility to "look out for the resources of the
state."
MR. JORDAN said that he strongly supported the proposed bill.
10:19:34 AM
CHAIR SEATON directed attention to a letter from the United
Fishermen of Alaska (UFA), dated March 11, 2013 [Included in
members' packets] which expressed its support for reducing catch
mortality, but emphasized that this was an issue which should be
addressed by the Alaska Board of Fisheries, and not the Alaska
State Legislature. He introduced an article by Alex Wertheimer,
"Hooking Mortality of Chinook Salmon Released by Commercial
Trollers." [Included in members' packets] He reported that Mr.
Wertheimer worked for the National Marine Fisheries Service at
the Auke Bay Laboratory in Juneau in 1988, when this article was
published. Reading from the Abstract at the top of page 1, he
stated: "The recalculated estimate of total hooking mortality
for legal and sublegal fish, based on wound severity, was 23.5
percent." He reported that the committee had pondered any means
for limiting "all kinds of unintended mortality."
10:21:13 AM
DAN DUNAWAY expressed his objection that the legislature was
"encroaching into the, what I see as, the realm of the Board of
Fish, that's the whole reason we have a Board of Fish." He
opined that a major reason for statehood had been for more
public involvement, and to remove some of these issues from "the
political arena." He offered his belief that the Alaska Board
of Fisheries was a more appropriate assemblage. He referenced
numerous fresh water studies that showed "a minimum biological
gain for a significant social cost." He said that the
definition of "barbless" often brought inadvertent violations
and "squabbles" that alienated an otherwise supportive public.
He offered his belief that there was not a significant gain from
these regulations. He reported that Idaho was in the process of
repealing its "barbless" rules and that Montana had also decided
not to adopt "barbless" regulations.
10:23:54 AM
CHAIR SEATON closed public testimony.
10:24:00 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON offered his belief that, although Chinook
Salmon fisheries required a triage treatment to specific
drainages, this was similar to applying a "Band-Aid to a very
severe injury."
CHAIR SEATON, in response, stated that all aspects of the low
stock returns of Chinook Salmon were being reviewed. He
reflected that the committee had agreed to sponsor a resolution
to lower the troll by-catch limits. He referenced testimony
from commercial fishermen that the release of wounded by-catch
had a significant, though unintended, mortality. He reported on
the studies from Washington and Oregon which indicated a need to
change fish harvesting operations in order to protect Chinook
Salmon from unintended mortalities. He reflected that the
problem was complex with many pieces, including species
interactions and habitats, and that one solution would not fix
the problem. He suggested that the purpose of the proposed bill
was to address one piece of the many problems.
10:27:11 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON questioned whether the legislature should
be involved and reduce the number of catch and release per day.
CHAIR SEATON replied that even a small reduction in the
mortality rate could be important, and that it was an idea
worthy of further discussion.
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON asked about the positions of Alaska
Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G) and the Alaska Board of
Fisheries on this legislation.
10:29:19 AM
CHARLES SWANTON, Director, Division of Sport Fish, Alaska
Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G), stated that ADF&G had a
neutral stance on the proposed bill. He announced that the
Alaska Board of Fisheries, amidst a lot of public input, had
dealt with similar issues in past years.
10:30:16 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON asked if the Alaska Board of Fisheries had
taken a position on any similar legislation.
MR. SWANTON replied that he did not recall that it had taken a
position on any legislation. In response to Representative
Herron, he opined that the board was "generally silent or
neutral." In response to an earlier question from
Representative Herron, he stated that some fisheries which
potentially had an issue with mortality, had options for
restrictions, including a prohibition for removal of the fish
from the water.
10:31:54 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON asked for a definition to "significant
probability."
MR. SWANTON surmised that, as referenced in the proposed
legislation, there would be a discussion between ADF&G and the
Alaska Board of Fisheries for what would constitute significant
probability. He acknowledged that, although he had given this
significant thought, he had not arrived at a simple answer. He
offered that significant would constitute greater than 50
percent, but, dependent on the situation, it could be as high as
95 percent.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON asked if one fish would be significant in
any stock of concern. He questioned whether this would vary by
stream, or by management of an area, and asked how this would be
designated.
MR. SWANTON acknowledged that it would need to be situational.
He explained that the answer became more complex when
contrasting Chinook Salmon escapement goals with other species
involved.
10:34:23 AM
CHAIR SEATON referred to Version N, page 1, line 7, and read:
"a person may not use a barbed hook when participating in a
freshwater fishery in which more than one species is present if
there is a significant probability of catching a species that
may not be retained under a regulation adopted by the Board of
Fisheries." He asked which would make the determination, the
significant probability or the Alaska Board of Fisheries.
MR. SWANTON agreed that this would require a conversation with
the Alaska Board of Fisheries.
CHAIR SEATON clarified that the intention of the proposed bill
was not to stipulate an absolute, but to allow the Alaska Board
of Fisheries the latitude to make a determination.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON offered a different interpretation for
the language of the proposed bill.
CHAIR SEATON expressed his agreement for the necessity to
clarify the intention, as stated in Version N, page 1, lines 11
- 13.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON expressed his understanding that the
Alaska Board of Fisheries would determine the need for action,
but he questioned what defined the significant probability and
how that would be managed.
10:38:14 AM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON, noting that commercial fishermen had
mentioned significant mortality for Chinook Salmon, asked
whether the commercial fishermen were using barbless hooks.
CHAIR SEATON referenced a previous proposal for the commercial
fishery to use barbless hooks which had not been adopted.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON suggested that HB 110 could be amended to
include barbless hooks for fisheries in both salt and fresh
water.
CHAIR SEATON agreed that it was possible to expand the bill for
recreational and commercial fisheries, as well. He pointed out
that the legislature had also imposed a 58 foot limit on
seiners, and that additional legislative action had determined
allowable types of fishing gear.
10:40:02 AM
MR. SWANTON added that in some high use, low retention
fisheries, a large number of lodges and guiding operations had
voluntarily required the use of barbless hooks by the guides and
guests. He clarified that there was a low percentage of
difference for mortality between a barbed and barbless hook. He
pointed out that the measuring for fisheries management was not
so refined to discern the difference between two and three
percent mortality. He stated that the department would,
instead, close the fishery rather than "shoulder the risk of
trying to deal with small percentages."
CHAIR SEATON stated that, as the decline of king salmon had
become an extensive problem for much of the state, the question
was whether or not to wait for more research or to search for a
solution. He said that it would continue to be difficult,
especially given the data for unintended mortality. He shared
his encouragement for the number of guides who required the use
of barbless hooks. He pointed out that the impetus for the
proposed bill had come from fly fishermen on the Kenai River.
10:45:04 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GATTIS expressed that there was a difference for
fishing guides using barbless hooks and fishermen "putting food
in the freezer." She asked for clarification that this
additional dimension to fisheries would not have any fiscal
implication. She declared that she would not fish "for catch
and release."
MR. SWANTON explained that ADF&G worked with the Alaska Board of
Fisheries, and would bring it up at a statewide meeting.
REPRESENTATIVE GATTIS opined that, as this would add another
duty, if it did not have an additional cost, then "something's
gonna be spread thinner."
MR. SWANTON replied that this would depend on the meeting time
and comprehensiveness for the amount of additional work during
the regulatory meeting. He said that although there would be
more focus on those specific fisheries issues, they would not
really be "spread thinner."
10:48:54 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GATTIS explained that she was addressing the cost
of enforcement that should be reflected in a fiscal note.
MR. SWANTON deferred.
10:49:49 AM
CHAIR SEATON asked to clarify if this would require more
enforcement with this regulation.
CAPTAIN WALDRON replied that the fiscal impacts could not be
determined until the language of the proposed bill was
completed.
[HB 110 was held over.]
10:51:55 AM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
HB 143-COMMERCIAL FISHING CREWMEMBER LICENSES
10:53:24 AM
CHAIR SEATON announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 143, "An Act relating to crewmember fishing
licenses."
10:53:34 AM
DOUGLAS DUNCAN, Staff, Representative Paul Seaton, Alaska State
Legislature, paraphrased from the sponsor statement, which read:
HB 143 increases the cost for a seven-day commercial
fishing crewmember license by $30, establishing the
cost at $60. This increase in license cost addresses
the growing problem of multiple consecutive short-term
license purchases. The seven-day license was created
by the Legislature as a way for tourists to experience
commercial fishing in Alaska. These short-term crew
licenses (also known as dude licenses) have been
successful in their original intent, but there is
concern that fishing crew members who would otherwise
purchase an annual license are instead purchasing
numerous consecutive short-term licenses.
As a trend, this decreases license receipt revenue to
the state and impacts the Fishermen's Fund (a fund
administered by the Department of Labor and Workforce
Development to assist with the medical costs of
accidents incurred during commercial fishing
operations). As a group, those purchasing short-term
licenses may be less experienced on a commercial
vessel, and thus more likely to get injured, placing a
burden on the Fishermen's Fund without helping to
adequately pay for the program.
MR. DUNCAN stated that the use of multiple licenses had resulted
in a revenue loss to the Fishermen's Fund, as 39 percent of the
license fee went to the fund. He estimated the loss of revenue
to the state and the Fishermen's Fund to be $285,000 since the
implementation of the program in 2005. He reiterated that the
proposed bill would increase the cost of the seven-day license
to $60, up from $30, to encourage the purchase of an annual
license. He stated that the current program was not able to
effectively limit the purchase to one temporary license per
person per year.
10:56:36 AM
CHAIR SEATON reminded the committee that there had been a
presentation about this from Alaska Department of Fish & Game
and Department of Labor & Workforce Development. He directed
attention to the charts from that presentation. [Included in
members' packets]
10:56:57 AM
CHAIR SEATON opened public testimony.
10:57:05 AM
MR. JORDAN stated his support for HB 143, and offered follow-up
comments on HB 110. Regarding proposed HB 143, he offered his
belief that a problem did exist when it was cheaper to purchase
seven-day commercial fishing licenses in succession versus a
seasonal license. He suggested that the seven-day commercial
licenses be priced at $30.00 for residents and $100.00 for non-
residents. Directing attention to page 1, line 7 of the
proposed bill, he pointed out that the seven-day commercial
license did not allow fishing with a rod and reel while on a
commercial fishing vessel. He expressed his support for the
proposed bill, with his suggested amendment for a change in the
price of the license.
CHAIR SEATON asked for clarification about fishing with rod and
reel, and whether the proposed $100.00 non-resident fee would
cover that aspect.
MR. JORDAN, in response, offered his understanding that a seven-
day commercial license would not allow fishing with a rod and
reel while on a commercial fishing vessel whereas, a full
commercial license would allow use of a rod and reel on the
commercial vessel. He expressed his support for this aspect.
11:02:48 AM
JAMES HERBERT, Commercial Fisherman, opened his comments with
three questions: what is the purpose of the seven-day license;
who benefits from this license; and, what is fair. He stated
that this idea had first been introduced in the Alaska State
Legislature in 2004, with an effective date in 2005. He
reported that this had been a difficult financial time for
commercial fishing in Western Alaska, and that this idea had
been to spur tourist interest in commercial fishing. He offered
his belief that the implications for licensing, liability, and
insurance associated with this had not been considered. He
pointed to the data which indicated a rapid increase in the
sales of non-resident, seven-day crew licenses, while the number
of resident seven-day licenses had decreased. He noted that,
although ADF&G did not indicate the districts for these licenses
purchases, he conjectured that the majority were for the short,
intense seasons in Bristol Bay and Cook Inlet, as multiple
shorter licenses were less expensive than an annual license.
Referring to the attached fiscal note, [Included in members'
packets] he pointed out that the projected revenue from the
proposed bill would be appreciably more if it also included the
sales of seven-day commercial licenses for only two or three
extensions. He offered his support for the seven-day commercial
license with "a fair allocation," for the benefit of Alaska
residents, while non-residents should be fairly assessed for
participation in commercial fishing. Offering some guidance for
pricing, he reminded the committee that the current price for a
seven-day non-resident sport fishing license was more than twice
the cost of a resident sport fishing license. He stated that
the limit for a claim to the Fishermen's Fund had been increased
to $10,000. He reported that 39 percent from the sale of each
fishing license was allocated to the fund. He offered his
belief that an increase to the non-resident seven-day permits
would lead to a decrease in revenue, with the possibility of
more injuries to less experienced, non-resident fishermen, and a
greater burden on the Fishermen's Fund. He expressed his
support for the proposed bill.
11:09:25 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON asked if there could be a limit of two to
the number of consecutive licenses purchased.
MR. HERBERT offered his belief that the points of sale through
the large number of vendors would make it difficult to track and
to enforce.
11:10:33 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS shared that he had also explored
this possibility and had determined that, although it was a
great idea, it was "just not logistically feasible."
11:11:18 AM
CHAIR SEATON closed public testimony.
11:11:50 AM
CHAIR SEATON moved to adopt Amendment 1, labeled 28-LS0520\A.1,
Bullard, 3/11/13, which read:
Page 1, line 1, following "licenses":
Insert "; and providing for an effective date"
Page 1, following line 10:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"* Sec. 2. This Act takes effect January 1, 2014."
11:12:36 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON objected for discussion.
CHAIR SEATON reviewed the need to coincide the effective date
with the publication of the ADF&G permit books.
11:13:35 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON removed his objection. There being no
further objection, Amendment 1 was adopted.
11:13:50 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS suggested that the rate of the
commercial license remain at $30 for residents and be raised to
a rate of $60.00 for non-residents. He opined that it was the
non-residents who were "gaming the system, right now, to get
these multiple permits, instead of getting the year-long
commercial fishing license." He stated that this also kept the
seven-day price lower than a seasonal permit for an in-state
family member.
11:15:09 AM
KEVIN BROOKS, Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner,
Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G), in response, said that
the statutes would need to be reviewed, as there was an annual
resident fee with a differential, currently $140, for the annual
non-resident fee. He suggested that, for fee construct, it was
easier for a proposed bill to have the same fee for residents
and non-residents, as the specified differential for non-
residents already existed. He pointed out that this
differential was reviewed every three years; therefore the price
point would also change every three years. He reported that the
new annual differential rate would be $190. He expressed
agreement for the lower residential seven-day commercial permit,
as the records indicated that only 17 seven-day residential
permits were purchased for a second period. He pointed out that
the cost for two of these residential seven-day permits was
equal to the cost for an annual license. He suggested that the
cost for a seven-day commercial license for both residents and
non-residents be equal to half of the cost for an annual
commercial license.
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS stated his disagreement with the
increase of the non-resident commercial license, and suggested
that a non-resident commercial license cost equal to one-third
of an annual commercial license would be more equitable, and
would be "pegged to that changing price point."
MR. BROOKS stated that analysis had indicated that the price
point could change the behavior of the buyer, and that the
fiscal note reflected an annual price which would be less
expensive than buying more than three seven-day permits. He
explained that the fiscal note would be revised if the prices in
the proposed bill were changed.
CHAIR SEATON asked if the committee wanted to work with ADF&G to
further investigate an option for the differential in license
price between residents and non-residents.
11:20:53 AM
REPRESENTATIVE GATTIS expressed her agreement with a price
differential between resident and non-resident licenses, and she
commented that the seven-day licenses were not always "gamed."
11:21:46 AM
CHAIR SEATON reviewed the rate proposals that had been
considered as a result from public comment. He asked ADF&G to
consider the differential, and suggest an appropriate rate that
would be optimally effective for a seven-day license.
[HB 143 was held over.]
11:23:40 AM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Special Committee on Fisheries meeting was adjourned at 11:23
a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 143 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/19/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |
| HB0143A.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |
| HB143-DFG-DAS-03-08-13.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/19/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |
| HB143-DOLWD-FF-3-8-13.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/19/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |
| Copy of 7 day crew licenses sold-Res and NonRes.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/19/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |
| Copy of 7-DayCrew_2005-2012_By-LicYr-Name.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/19/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |
| Fish Fund license permit revenue (2).pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/19/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |
| Juneau Empire article on 7-day crew license.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |
| HB0110A.pdf |
HFSH 2/21/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| HB 110 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFSH 2/21/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| Barbed and Barbless Hooks and their effect on Juvenile and Adult Salmonoid Mortality.pdf |
HFSH 2/21/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| Washington State News Release Barbless Hooks on Colombia River.pdf |
HFSH 2/21/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| ADF&G Notice - Recommended use of Barbless Hooks Susitna River.pdf |
HFSH 2/21/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| ADF&G Notice - Recommended use of Barbless Hooks Chitna, Copper, Gakona, Gulkana.pdf |
HFSH 2/21/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| Mortality of coho salmon caught and released using sport tackle in the Little Susitna River, Alaska.pdf |
HFSH 2/21/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| Bendock and Alexandersdottir 1993.pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| Please be advised I oppose HB 110.pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| PVOA_HB 110_Comments.pdf |
HFSH 2/26/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| Wertheimer 1988_Chinook discard mort (2).pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/21/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| HB 110 CS Work Draft Version N.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| HB 110 Version N Amendments.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 110 |
| HB 143 Version A Amendment 1.pdf |
HFSH 3/12/2013 10:00:00 AM |
HB 143 |